{"memberId": "10000047235", "clinician": "Erin Barker", "qaAnalyst": "Holly Beck", "queryData": [{"date": "Wed, 18 Feb 2026 14:33:05 GMT", "name": "Holly ", "role": "qa", "files": [], "query": {"feedback": "Hey Erin,\n1) pt taking a statin, has he been using it long term, if so, can you  add statins to long term use \n2 ) I see depression under the neuro section but anxiety also mentioned on the med list, if he also has anxiety can you add that to the NEURO section too \n3) under GU section for the accuired cyst can you remove this I see the comment member unaware of this diagnosis if he didn't endorse it, then I would remove it \n", "response": ""}, "mailId": ""}, {"date": "Thu, 19 Feb 2026 00:54:19 GMT", "name": "Erin ", "role": "nurse", "files": [], "query": {"feedback": "", "response": "1. and 2. are complete. So I guess I'm not sure what I am supposed to be doing about diagnoses that members can't endorse. It's not uncommon for patients to be unaware of them, but it doesn't mean they don't have them. I just had another reviewer ask me about a diagnosis that was on the problem list which the member took medications for, but the member didn't know he had said diagnosis. The reviewer asked me to remove the comment. Are we supposed to disregard a diagnosis when a member denies knowledge of it when they actually may just be lacking understanding? I mean this with no disrespect! I know it's hard to tell inflection via messaging. :)"}, "mailId": ""}], "memberName": "Gordon Brasslett", "codingAnalyst": "", "dateOfService": "02/10/2026 01:30 PM", "clinicianMailId": "e.barker@focuscares.com", "qaAnalystMailId": "h.beck@focuscares.com", "codingAnalystMailId": ""}